对于好意思国奥运选手埃里扬·奈顿类固醇阳性的声明【BBST-025】爆乳騎乗位 3

咱们细心到《环球时报》发布了对于好意思国奥运田径新星埃里扬·奈顿（Erriyon Knighton）雀跃剂阳性疑窦的报说念。四肢好意思国奥运田径代表队的选手，奈顿在本年3月26日的雀跃剂赛外检验中被查出呈类固醇（群勃龙）阳性。但好意思国反雀跃剂机构（USADA）在巴黎奥运会国内预选赛运行前倏得作出决定，宣称奈顿的阳性成果是由怒放员食用了受期侮的肉类引起的，决定不合其膨大禁赛处罚，并允许他最终代表好意思国插足巴黎奥运会。而USADA在面临中国游水怒放员雀跃剂期侮事件时，却弘扬出典型的“双重圭臬”：一方面戮力为本国怒放员解脱，但另一方面却冷落寰球反雀跃剂机构（WADA）屡次讲解注解与瑞士寂然查抄官论说，驳倒中国反雀跃剂中心和WADA一说念“掩盖真相”，条目对中国怒放员膨大制裁。

正如媒体报说念所言，奈顿雀跃剂阳性案件的诸多疑窦仍悬而未决。据有关商讨标明，群勃龙是一种卵白同化制剂，具有极强的种植力量和爆发力的作用，并不是常见的期侮物资。连年来，全球发生了数以百计的群勃龙阳性。据公开信息显露，绝大精深阳性王人是基于四年禁赛的圭臬赐与处罚，仅三名好意思国怒放员因见地食物期侮而脱逃了处罚。在奈顿案件中，该案件的寂然仲裁人裁定，受期侮的肉类来自佛罗里达州的一家餐馆。问题在于：USADA在事隔两个月后才开展拜谒，恰巧又从肃清家餐馆购买的不同批次的牛肉中检出了群勃龙，如斯恰好简直让东说念主匪夷所想。若是好意思国市集的牛肉确切存在精深的群勃龙期侮，USADA是否开展过平庸的市集拜谒，是否作念过数据统计，是否辅导过好意思国怒放员细心肉食物期侮的问题，是否商讨过吃若干期侮的肉类会导致怒放员检测阳性？USADA老成东说念主在WADA尚未审查档册，上诉期限并未界限的情况下即发表公开声明宣称“正义得到了伸张”。更值得怀疑的是，该声明目下已被USADA从官网中撤稿，与之一并被撤稿的还包括其过往无差错期侮案件的声明与报说念。如斯反常的行动到底是在遮掩什么？

从奈顿案件中可见一斑：USADA嘴上倡导着口头自制白净，骨子步履却以火去蛾中。其表态与骨子行动水火不容更体目下好意思国的管事体育定约和大学体育定约（NCAA）自行制定反雀跃剂圭臬，与《寰球反雀跃剂条例》存在明显破碎，USADA也不合他们进行检验，造成了浩大的体育暗箱。USADA是《寰球反雀跃剂条例》的签约方，但四肢好意思国收视率最高的几个管事体育联赛的定约——好意思国管事棒球大定约（MLB）、好意思国管事篮球联赛（NBA）、好意思国管事橄榄球大定约（NFL）以及北好意思管事冰球定约（NHL）却不受《寰球反雀跃剂条例》的统领，且四肢绝大精深最告捷的好意思国怒放员的培育者——NCAA也未签署《寰球反雀跃剂条例》。2006年的《米切尔论说》曾指出跳跃八十五名现役和退役棒球怒放员使用了雀跃剂，有球员宣称，百分之四十、五十，致使百分之八十的球员王人在使用类固醇。WADA现任主席班卡在近期会议中默示：“高达90%的好意思国怒放员，包括管事和大学体育怒放员莫得死守WADA有关条例。”此外，2020年收效的《罗琴科夫反雀跃剂法》允许该国对海外体育赛事中的雀跃剂事件实行“域外刑事统领权”。该法案宣称是为了打击雀跃剂步履，但却将好意思国国内的管事联赛、大学联赛等赛事摒除在外，这也讲解好意思国政府对于其国表里的反雀跃剂责任明显接收了双重圭臬。

USADA对自己经久以来的反雀跃剂“陈规”闭明塞聪，反而执迷于“越界统领”，条目对其他国度膨大制裁，妄图通过驳倒、打击中国异常他国度以滚动其国内反雀跃剂责任中存在的严重缺点，这是赤裸裸的政事操弄和装假双标。自本年4月以来，好意思国国会、反雀跃剂机构、媒体在中国游水怒放员食物期侮案件上挑升选拔性失明失聪，企图通过握造坑害稠浊瑕瑜，让海外社会与公共产生造作默契，并借此将反雀跃剂问题政事化，饱读励好意思国公法部和联邦拜谒局动用国内公法和政事工夫进行拜谒，发起对该事件的“长臂统领”。如斯不顾吃相的恶劣步履，不仅是原原来本的“双重圭臬”，也曾对“自制自制”理念的鼎力糟踏。咱们再次浓烈敦促USADA罢手东说念主为制造虚假叙事和泛政事化的默契操弄，罢手骚扰和破碎运行有用的寰球反雀跃剂次序和贬责体系，罢手以所谓的“法律工夫”搞威逼施压和滥施“长臂统领”；从头疑望其在处理雀跃剂案件时的程序和原则【BBST-025】爆乳騎乗位 3，确保其行动与全球反雀跃剂体系的目的相符，况且在反雀跃剂责任中八成展现出应有的诚信和一致性，以从头得到海外社会对其责任的信任。

CHINADA Statement on the U.S. Olympian Erriyon Knighton’s Positive Test for Steroid

China Anti-Doping Agency (CHINADA) noted that the Global Times has published a report on the doubts about the Adverse Analytical Finding (AAF) case of the U.S. sprinting star Erriyon Knighton. Knighton, a member of the U.S. Olympic track and field team, tested positive for a banned steroid (trenbolone) during an out-of-competition test on March 26. In a surprising turn, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) abruptly decided before the start of the domestic qualifiers for the Paris Olympics that no ineligibility would be imposed on Knighton, claiming that Knighton’s positive result for trenbolone was caused by his ingestion of contaminated meat, and allowed him to eventually represent the United States at the Paris Olympics.

However, when it comes to the contamination cases of the Chinese swimmers, USADA has shown a typical double standard by trying its best to clear American athletes on one hand, but on the other hand accusing CHINADA and the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) of “covering up the truth” and demanding sanctions against Chinese athletes while ignoring the repeated clarifications by WADA and the report by the Independent Prosecutor.

As reported by the media, many suspicions about Knighton’s AAF case remain unresolved. Studies have shown that trenbolone is an anabolic agent with strong enhancing effects on strength and explosiveness, and is not a common contaminant. Hundreds of AAF cases for trenbolone have occurred around the world in recent years in total, and publicly available information shows that while the athletes involved in most of these trenbolone AAF cases were essentially given a four-year ineligibility, three American athletes have escaped sanctions by claiming food contamination. In the Knighton case, the independent arbitrator concluded that the contaminated meat in this case came from a restaurant in Florida. Here’s the problem: it’s a strange coincidence that while USADA didn’t start investigation until two months later, it happened to detect trenbolone in a different batch of beef purchased from the same restaurant. If there is indeed widespread beef contamination of trenbolone in the U.S. market, has USADA ever conducted an extensive market research and collected data? Has it warned the American athletes about the problem of meat contamination? Has it studied how much contaminated meat can cause a positive test? The CEO of USADA publicly declared in a statement that “justice was served” before WADA had even reviewed the case and before the deadline for appeal had yet expired. What is even more suspicious is that this statement has now been removed from USADA’s website, along with its previous statements and releases on no-fault contamination cases. What are they trying to hide behind this unusual action?

The Knighton case just shows that USADA’s rhetoric about fairness and clean sport runs counter to its actual practices. This contradiction is even more evident in the fact that the main professional leagues and the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) of the U.S. have their own standards for anti-doping that are in clear conflict with the World Anti-Doping Code (the Code), and that these athletes are not subject to any testing by USADA. This has created a huge backroom in sport. While USADA is a signatory to the Code, the most-watched sports leagues in the U.S.—the Major League Baseball (MLB), the National Basketball Association (NBA), the National Football League (NFL), and the National Hockey League (NHL)—are not protected by the Code, and the NCAA, the cradle of the vast majority of the most successful American athletes, has not signed the Code. The Mitchell Report published in 2006 named more than 85 active and retired baseball players who had doped. Some players claimed that 40%, 50%, or even 80% of the baseball athletes were taking steroids. The WADA President, Mr. Witold Bańka also pointed out in a recent meeting that “90% of American athletes, those in pro leagues and college sport, don’t compete under World Anti-Doping Code”.

In addition, the Rodchenkov Anti-Doping Act, which came into effect in 2020, asserts criminal jurisdiction over doping cases in international sports events that occurred outside its national borders. This act, while claiming to be combating doping offenses, excludes its domestic professional leagues, college leagues and other U.S. events. This is another obvious example of the double standards that the U.S. is practicing when targeting its anti-doping work towards American athletes and athletes from other countries.

The U.S. has turned a blind eye to its long history of doping problems, but is obsessed with “cross-border jurisdiction” and asserting sanctions against other countries. It seems that the accusation and attack on China and other countries is its tactic to deflect attention from the serious flaws in its own anti-doping work. This is sheer political manipulation and hypocritical double standards. Since April this year, the U.S. Congress, USADA and the U.S. media have adopted a selective approach when it comes to the contamination cases of the Chinese swimmers when they attempt to mislead the international community and the general public by confusing right and wrong through fabrication and frame-up. Moreover, they are trying to politicize anti-doping by instigating the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation to initiate a “long-arm jurisdiction” over this case by opening an investigation using its domestic judicial and administrative means. Such utterly disgraceful and despicable attempts are not only a stark double standard, but are also wanton violations of the principles of fairness and justice.

Once again【BBST-025】爆乳騎乗位 3, we urge USADA to cease fabricating false narratives, politicizing anti doping and manipulating public perception, to stop disrupting and undermining the well-functioning world anti-doping order and global governance system, and to put an end to the abuse of “long-arm jurisdiction” and threatening and pressuring with so-called “legal means”. We call on USADA to review the approaches and principles it has adopted in doping cases to ensure compliance with the goals of the global anti-doping system, and to demonstrate due integrity and consistency in their work. This is the right way to regain trust of the international community in its anti-doping work.